✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
AI text detectors misclassified over half of non-native English speakers' TOEFL essays as AI-generated in a 2023 Stanford study.
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against
Is it true that AI text detectors misclassified over half of non-native English speakers' TOEFL essays as AI-generated in a 2023 Stanford study?
Unclear. Two sources partially support the claim: a 2026 systematic review reports that six experimental studies found AI detectors falsely labeled non-native English speakers' writing as AI-created in 50.2%–61.3% of cases, and a 2026 protocol cites a foundational 2023 study reporting a 61.3% mean false-positive rate on non-native English speakers' essays. Neither confirms that the study was conducted at Stanford or used TOEFL essays specifically.
Verdict: PARTIAL LEAN · 3 sources for, 0 against · Last checked
Evidence for · 3
Get citation
JCY, N., C, K., & L, A. C. (2026). The impact of generative artificial intelligence tools on assessment equity for non-native English-speaking medical students: a systematic review.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09303-7
See more details
More for · 2
Get citation
Agha, A. & Anwar, E. (2026). Algorithmic Penalty for Non-Native Voices: A Three-Arm Diagnostic Accuracy Audit of Five Commercial AI Text Detectors Against Pre-LLM Scientific Literature — Protocol for the AUDIT-AI Study. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10164745/v1
Get citation
W, L., M, Y., Y, M., E, W., & J, Z. (2023). GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100779
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work