trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

AI-text detectors accurately identify AI-generated source code as machine-written.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 3 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that AI-text detectors accurately identify AI-generated source code as machine-written?

No. An empirical study found that existing AI-content detectors perform poorly at detecting AI-generated source code, and a separate study of GPTZero reported high false-positive rates on written text. No retrieved item shows detectors accurately identifying AI-generated code.

Verdict: REFUTED · 0 sources for, 3 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence against · 3
Get citation
An Empirical Study on Automatically Detecting AI-Generated Source Code: How Far Are We?. (n.d.). arxiv.org. https://arxiv.org/html/2411.04299v1

See more details
More against · 2
2026
Get citation
Shamsi, A., Wang, T., Amraei, M., & Raju, N. V. (2026). Evaluating AI Text Detection Tools for Distinguishing Human-Written from AI-Generated Abstracts in Persian-Language Journals of Library and Information Science. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.aip.293

2025
Get citation
Paullet, K., Pinchot, J., Kinney, E., & Stewart, T. (2025). Utilizing GPTZero to Detect AI-Generated Writing. eric.ed.gov. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1482073

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work