✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Accounts sharing misinformation receive higher engagement per follower than high credibility accounts on major social platforms.
the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 2 against
Is it true that accounts sharing misinformation receive higher engagement per follower than high credibility accounts on major social platforms?
Partly. Two multi-platform studies report greater relative engagement with low-credibility or unreliable content on most platforms, while two health-content analyses find engagement metrics only weakly related to information quality. None measures engagement per follower, so the claim is only partially addressed.
Verdict: CONTESTED PARTIAL · 3 sources for, 2 against · Last checked
Evidence for · 3
Get citation
Misinformation in the Gaza war. (n.d.). en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misinformation_in_the_Gaza_war
Evidence against · 2
Get citation
R, H., J, J., P, Y., Y, Y., Y, X., A, P., J, Y., & X, C. (2026). Quality and Reliability of Social Media Videos on Weight-Loss Interventions for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Multi-Platform Cross-Sectional Study.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.2147/nss.s599776
See more details
More for · 2
Get citation
Corsi, G. (2023). Evaluating Twitter’s algorithmic amplification of low-credibility content: an observational study. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00456-3
Relative engagement with sources of climate misinformation is growing across social media platforms.
Get citation
S, S., M, F., W, Q., & M, C. (2025). Relative engagement with sources of climate misinformation is growing across social media platforms.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03082-9
More against · 1
Get citation
X, W., Z, S., Z, Z., L, Z., D, Z., & M, C. (2026). Short-form video platforms as a source of ankylosing spondylitis information: a cross-sectional content analysis.. doi.org. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2026.1757584
Receipt History
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any
personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check
or guarantee a response time.
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work