trustmebro.to/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

A frog sitting in slowly heated water does not try to escape and is boiled alive.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 1 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Is it true that a frog sitting in slowly heated water does not try to escape and is boiled alive?

No. A Skeptics Stack Exchange answer directly denies the claim, stating frogs do not stay in slowly heated water until dead and calling the boiling-frog story a legend. Two other sources merely repeat the trope as a metaphor without evidence.

Verdict: REFUTED · 2 sources for, 1 against · Last checked

The private library was unavailable for some searches in this check. Missing library results are not evidence against the claim.

Evidence for · 2
1997
Get citation
Where to go from here. (1997). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.1049/pbme101e_ch8

Evidence against · 1
2011
Get citation
Can a frog be slowly boiled alive without it noticing?. (2011). skeptics.stackexchange.com. https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/5402/can-a-frog-be-slowly-boiled-alive-without-it-noticing

See more details
More for · 1
2019
Get citation
Articulating Alternatives: Moving Past a Plug-and-Play Prosthetic Media Model. (2019). doi.org. https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.1596

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work