trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The depth of the water beneath a waterfall is determined by the plunge pool erosion rate.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against

Retrieved literature confirms that analytical models predict steady-state plunge-pool depth using sediment transport mechanics and erosion processes.

Evidence for · 3
2021 · cited by 6
AbstractWaterfall plunge pools experience cycles of sediment aggradation and scour that modulate bedrock erosion, habitat availability, and hazard potential. We calculate sediment flux divergence to evaluate the conditions under which pools deposit and scour sediment by comparing the sediment transport capacities of waterfall plunge pools (Qsc_pool) and their adjacent river reaches (Qsc_river). Results show that pools fill with sediment at low river discharge because the waterfall jet is not strong enough to transport the supplied sediment load out of the pool. As discharge increases, the waterfall jet strengthens, allowing pools to transport sediment at greater rates than in adjacent river reaches. This causes sediment scour from pools and bar building at the downstream pool boundary. While pools may be partially emptied of sediment at modest discharge, floods with recurrence intervals >10 yr are typically required for pools to scour to bedrock. These results allow new constraints on paleodischarge estimates made from sediment deposited in plunge pool bars and suggest that bedrock erosion at waterfalls with plunge pools occurs during larger floods than in river reaches lacking waterfalls.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+2p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 2
2016 · cited by 0
Many waterfalls have deep plunge pools that are often partially or fully filled with sediment. Sediment fill may control plunge-pool bedrock erosion rates, partially determine habitat availability for aquatic organisms, and affect sediment routing and debris flow initiation. Currently, there exists no mechanistic model to describe sediment transport through waterfall plunge pools. Here we develop an analytical model to predict steady-state plunge-pool depth and sediment-transport capacity by combining existing jet theory with sediment transport mechanics. Our model predicts plunge-pool sedimen
cited by 0
thousands of years, the plunge pool at the waterfall base continued to expand, creating a large overhanging precipice and cavern where the hard basalt San Rafael Falls (Spanish: Salto de San Rafael) was a waterfall on the Coca River in Sucumbíos and Napo, Ecuador. Standing 131 metres (430 ft) high, it was the tallest and most powerful waterfall in Ecuador and a popular tourist attraction. The falls were located at the eastern boundary of Cayambe Coca National Park, in the eastern Andean foothills about 170 kilometres (110 mi) to the east of Quit The debris flow material downstream of the lava dam washed away, increasing the drop to over 130 metres (430 ft). Over thousands of years, the plunge pool at the waterfall base continued to expand, creating a large overhanging precipice and cavern where the hard basalt layer rested atop the loose material below. At this point, the knickpoint became relatively stable, with the overhanging basalt protecting the loose material below from further upstream erosion. The area around El Reventador remains tectonically active. A March 1987 earthquake caused large debris flows into the Coca River that reached San Rafael Falls. The debris flows reached an estimated depth of 20 metres (66 ft) at the falls. Prior to the collapse, the falls were a major tourist attraction for the area. In 2019 about 30,000 people visited the falls. The falls were accessible by an approximately thirty-minute hike from nearby Hostería El Reventador (about 50 kilometres (31 mi) by road northeast of El Chaco) which brought visitors to a scenic view point, "La Mirador", above the falls. Although located near the Cayambe-Coca National Park, the falls themselves were actually on a small private preserve. In 2010, construction had begun on the Coca Codo Sinclair Dam about 19 kilometres (12 mi) upstream from the waterfall. The 1,500 megawatt hydroelectric plant, Ecuador's largest power station, was designed to divert water around a large bend ("codo") of the Coca River, utilizing the natural drop of the waterfall and river to generate power. Despite creating significant controversy over its ecological impact and its potential to reduce the flow of the waterfall, the project was completed in 2016. The developers of Coca Codo Sinclair promised to maintain a minimum flow of 22 cubic metres per second (780 cu ft/s) over the falls, or about one-quarter of its typical dry season flow. The waterfall had been undergoing noticeable geomorphic changes since the 1990s, when it fell in two distinct stages: a smaller upper cascade followed by a large lower plunge. By about 2010, much of the lower lip of the falls had eroded away, bringing the two tiers close together; in 2015 that section collapsed completely,…
Everything we examined (4) — 3 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Mass balance controls on sediment scour and bedrock erosion in waterfall plunge poolspeer-reviewedsame source L2no side taken
  2. Mass balance controls on sediment scour and bedrock erosion in waterfall plunge poolspeer-reviewedsame source L2no side taken
  3. Sediment transport through self-adjusting, bedrock-walled waterfall plunge poolsreferenceno side taken
  4. San Rafael Fallsreferenceno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt