trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The term modification has multiple distinct meanings in Spinozas Ethics
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Reference literature notes that Spinoza uses terms like mode and modification interchangeably while occasionally employing modification to signify finite things influenced by external causes.

Evidence for · 1
2016 · cited by 0
In the Ethics, Spinoza uses mode, modification, and affection as synonyms. They all mean a thing that is in another. He seems to use modification and affection a little more often when he's referring to modes in which the essence of a finite thing is modified by a partly external cause rather than by its own properties.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. does 'modification' have more than one meaning in Spinoza's Ethics?referenceno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt