trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Burned matchsticks are attracted to magnets due to the formation of magnetic iron oxides
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Reference material explains that certain matchstick heads contain iron oxide as a colorant, and the combustion process can reduce it into magnetic iron or iron compounds, explaining why burned matchsticks are attracted to magnets.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
# What is behind of the attraction between a burned matchstick with a magnet? Tags: thermodynamics, quantum-chemistry, home-experiment, combustion, magnetism - Score: 23 - Views: 9723 - Answers: 1 - Answered: yes - Asked by: Another.Chemist (2650 rep) - Asked: 2017-05-02 - Edited: 2017-05-04 - Site: chemistry ## Question I do not know how to understand the reasons of why a burned matchstick is attracted by a magnet (most probably) of Neodymium. Here are some screenshots of a video in which this natural phenomenon is presented: (In the video, see at 1 min 25 s): Source Source ## Answers ### Answer by aventurin (score: 13 [ACCEPTED]) Some matchstick heads contain iron(III) oxide as a colorant. The yellowish color of the burning match indicates that it has low oxygen, i.e. a reducing flame. It reduces the iron oxide to iron which is attracted by the magnet. The reduction reactions that occur are probably quite complex. Below are two simplified possible reaction equations. $\ce{(CH2)_n}$ in equation (2) stands for paraffin from the splint's impregnation. $$\ce{Fe2O3 + 3 CO -> 2 Fe + 3 CO2} \tag{1}$$ $$\ce{Fe2O3 + \frac{1}{n} (CH2)_n -> 2 Fe + CO2 + H2O} \tag{2}$$
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Join Chemistryreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 001 Aug 2026
held for human review11 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt