trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
A server owned by Donald Trump was configured to selectively communicate with a Russian bank.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 1 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Fact-checking records from Snopes refute the claim that a Trump Organization computer server was tied to a Russian bank.

Evidence against · 1
cited by 0
Was a Trump Organization Computer Server Tied to a Russian Bank? | Snopes.com Snopes Now available in the app store! Open Log in to activate your ad-free access. It looks like you might have a Snopes membership! Log in to enjoy your ad-free experience. Log In From Snopes You're browsing with fewer ads for the next 24 hours, thanks to our sponsor https://l.join1440.com/?utm_source=snopes&utm_medium=website. Learn more → Fact Check # Was a Trump Organization Computer Server Tied to a Russian Bank? ## Claims that Donald Trump's organization was deeply connected to a Russian bank via a computer server have not yet been proved. ### Kim LaCapria ### Published Nov. 1, 2016 Claim: Experts confirmed a computer server linked to Donald Trump "was communicating with Russia." Rating: Unproven (retired) About this rating On 31 October 2016 Slate published an article with the headline "Was a Trump Server Communicating With Russia?." The inquisitive title introduced a lengthy article and a mish-mash of circumstantial details positing that Donald Trump maintained "secretive" financial ties to Russia which came to light in the course of an unofficial investigation: In late spring, thi
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:single_source:for=0+0p:against=1+0p | v55:sufficiency | v55:coherence_repaired:what=summary

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Was a Trump Organization Computer Server Tied to a Russian Bank? | Snopes.comfact-checkerno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 004 Aug 2026
held for human review12 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt