trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The conversation between Dawkins and Justin Brierley is genuine
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Available records confirm that the interview between Richard Dawkins and Justin Brierley took place as a genuine, unedited radio recording.

Evidence for · 1
Is this conversation between Dawkins and Justin Brierley genuine?
2012 · cited by 0
The conversation did certainly take place in the interview linked to by Oliver_C. There is no sign on the interview of any editing, misleading or otherwise. It's a transcript from this 10 min long radio interview (excerpt above starts at 05m:29s) — Oliver_C As a pure materialist who has often stated that everything is a product of time, chance and the laws of physics, Dawkins really doesn't have much choice but to agree that morality fits into that category too.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Is this conversation between Dawkins and Justin Brierley genuine?referenceno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt