trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Referring and predicating are distinct from illocutionary acts
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Linguistic and philosophical literature establishes that acts of referring and predicating function as distinct components or building blocks separate from illocutionary acts within speech act theory.

Evidence for · 3
1982 · cited by 0
Perlocutionary acts acts © 0 Illocutionary acts Illocutionary acts © Locutionary acts L Figure 7 … act of stating that acts of referring and predicating are also successfully performed. But … in development does not seem to be distinct from the problem of explanation in psychology
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:for=2+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 2
1978 · cited by 0
... acts . Now let us consider some differences between behavioural - communicative acts in general and illocutionary ... predicating expression is conjoined with one or more referring expressions ... different parts of linguistic acts ...
1990 · cited by 0
sentences. Referring and predicating are the building blocks out of which illocutionary acts are … effects of illocutionary acts. Syntax and semantics. In [direct] illocutionary acts, we have … to illocutionary acts, 12, 16, 170, 174 conversational, 96 different from illocutionary acts
Everything we examined (4) — 2 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Explanations in the study of child language developmentreferencesame source L5no side taken
  2. The Social Context of Languagereferencesame source L4no side taken
  3. Rationalism, Realism, and Relativismreferencesame source L4no side taken
  4. Reference and computation : an essay in applied philosophy of languagereferencesame source L5no side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 004 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt