trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Auditory perception alters subjective time estimation, making music feel slower under certain conditions
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Available research partially indicates that auditory stimuli and musical factors such as tempo influence subjective time and interval duration estimation, though specific claims regarding music feeling slower under defined conditions require more targeted direct evidence.

Evidence for · 2
2016 · cited by 0
Data from: Opposite distortions in interval timing perception for visual and auditory stimuli with temporal modulations | Zenodo Skip to main You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience. Dryad Published August 7, 2016 | Version v1 Dataset Open Data from: Opposite distortions in interval timing perception for visual and auditory stimuli with temporal modulations Authors/Creators Yuasa, Kenichi 1 Yotsumoto, Yuko 1 Show affiliations 1. University of Tokyo Description When an object is presented visually and moves or flickers, the perception of its duration tends to be overestimated. Such an overestimation is called time dilation. Perceived time can also be distorted when a stimulus is presented aurally as an auditory flutter, but the mechanisms and their relationship to visual processing remains unclear. In the present study, we measured interval timing perception while modulating the temporal characteristics of visual and auditory stimuli, and investigated whether the interval times of visually and aurally presented objects shared a common mechanism. In these experiments, participants compared the durations of flickering or fluttering stimuli to standard stimuli, which were presented continuously. Perceived durations for auditory flutters were underestimated, while perceived durations of visual flickers were overestimated. When auditory flutters and visual flickers were presented simultaneously, these distortion effects were cancelled out. When auditory flutters were presented with a constantly presented visual stimulus, the interval timing perception of the visual stimulus was affected by the auditory flutters. These results indicate that interval timing perception is governed by independent mechanisms for visual and auditory processing, and that there are some interactions between the two processing systems. Versions External resources Indexed in OpenAIRE Communities Keywords and subjects Keywords time perception Details DOI DOI Badge DOI 10.5061/dryad.q26g1 Markdown [![DOI](https://zenodo.org/badge/DOI/10.5061/dryad.q26g1.svg)](https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.q26g1) reStructuredText ..
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:partial_only:for=0+2p:against=0+0p | v55:multi_partial_one_side:lean=lean_partial:for:one_sided

More for · 1
cited by 0
The influence of tonality, tempo, and musical sophistication on the listener’s time-duration estimates - PMC Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) . 2023 Oct 31;77(9):1846–1864. doi: 10.1177/17470218231203459 # The influence of tonality, tempo, and musical sophistication on the listener’s time-duration estimates 2, José Oliveira Martins 1 Editors: Ruth Ogden, John Wearden, Luke Jones - Author information - Article notes - Copyright and License information 1Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies (CEIS20), Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal 2Royal Northern College of Music, Manchester, UK ✉ Ligia Borges Silva, Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies (CEIS20), Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Coimbra, Coimbra 3000-186, Portugal. Emails:ligia.silva@student.fl.uc.pt; ligiaborgessilva@hotmail.com Received 2022 Oct 4; Revised 2023 Jun 21; Accepted 2023 Jun 28; Issue date 2024 Sep. © Experimental Psychology Society 2023 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Lficense (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which p
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Data from: Opposite distortions in interval timing perception for visual and auditory stimuli with temporal modulationsprimary-datano side taken
  2. The influence of tonality, tempo, and musical sophistication on the listener’s time-duration estimatesreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review11 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt