trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Humans can consciously detect and respond to human pheromones
the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 1 against

Retrieved sources offer mixed and partial evidence regarding human pheromones, noting potential behavioral responses to specific compounds like androstadienone while highlighting that anatomical structures like the vomeronasal organ are generally considered inactive in adult humans.

Evidence for · 2
cited by 0
functions, including detecting desirable foods, hazards, and pheromones, and plays a role in taste. In humans, it occurs when an odor binds to a receptor within The sense of smell, or olfaction, is the special sense through which smells (or odors) are perceived. The sense of smell has many functions, including detecting desirable foods, hazards, and pheromones, and plays a role in taste. In humans, it occurs when an odor binds to a receptor within the nasal cavity, transmitting a signal through the olfactory system. Glomeruli aggregate signals from these E… The sense of smell, or olfaction, is the special sense through which smells (or odors) are perceived. The sense of smell has many functions, including detecting desirable foods, hazards, and pheromones, and plays a role in taste. In humans, it occurs when an odor binds to a receptor within the nasal cavity, transmitting a signal through the olfactory system. Glomeruli aggregate signals from these receptors and transmit them to the olfactory bulb, where the sensory input will start to interact with parts of the brain responsible for smell identification, memory, and emotion. Of the genes that code for odor receptors, only a portion are functional. Humans have far fewer active odor receptor genes than other primates and other mammals. In mammals, each olfactory receptor neuron expresses only one functional odor receptor. Odor receptor nerve cells function like a key–lock system: if the airborne molecules of a certain chemical can fit into the lock, the nerve cell will respond. There are, at present, a number of competing theories regarding the mechanism of odor coding and perception. According to the shape theory, each receptor detects a feature of the odor molecule. The weak-shape theory, known as the odotope theory, suggests that different receptors detect only small pieces of molecules, and these minimal inputs are combined to form a larger olfactory perception (similar to the way visual perception is built up of smaller, information-poor sensations, combined and refined to create a detailed overall perception). According to a new study, researchers have found that a functional relationship exists between molecular volume of odorants and the olfactory neural response. Fish, mice, and female humans are able to smell some aspect of the MHC genes of potential sex partners and prefer partners with MHC genes different from their own. However, some research suggests that taking hormonal contraception can alter women's preference for partners with dissimilar MHC genes, thus resulting in a greater likelihood to choose partners with relatively similar MHC genes to their own. Sexual orientation can also influence preference for different body odors, and some studies suggest that preference may be influenced by the putative pheromones AND and EST. Humans can detect blood relatives from olfaction. Their success is influenced by the turbulence of the air plume that is being followed. == Genetics == Different people smell various odors, and most of these differences are caused by genetic variation. Although odorant receptor genes make up one of the largest gene families in the human genome, only a handful of genes have been conclusively linked to particular smells. For instance, the odorant receptor OR5A1 and its genetic variants (alleles) determine the ability to smell β-ionone, a key aroma compound in foods and beverages. Similarly, the odorant receptor OR2J3 is associated with the ability to detect the "grassy" odor, cis-3-hexen-1-ol. That is, the brain's smell-recognizing centers must react to the stimulus detected for the animal to be said to show a response to the smell in question. It is estimated that dogs, in general, have an olfactory sense approximately ten thousand to a hundred thousand times more acute than a human's. This does not mean they are overwhelmed by smells our noses can detect; rather, it means they can discern a molecular presence when it is in much greater dilution in the carrier, air. Scent hounds as a group can smell one- to ten-million times more acutely than a human, and bloodhounds, which have the keenest sense of smell of any dogs, have noses ten- to one-hundred-million times more sensitive than a human's. They were bred for the specific purpose of tracking humans, and can detect a scent trail a few days old. The second-most-sensitive nose is possessed by the Basset Hound, which was bred to track and hunt rabbits and other small animals. Grizzly bears have a sense of smell seven times stronger than that of the bloodhound, essential for locating food underground. Using their elongated claws, bears dig deep trenches in search of burrowing animals and nests as well as roots, bulbs, and insects. Bears can detect the scent of food from up to eighteen miles away; because of their immense size, they often scavenge new kills, driving away the predators (including packs of wolves and human hunters) in the process. The sense of smell is less developed in the catarrhine primates, and nonexistent in cetaceans, which compensate with a well-developed sense of taste. In some strepsirrhines, such as the red-bellied lemur, scent glands occur atop the head. Fish, too, have a well-developed sense of smell, even though they inhabit an aquatic environment. Unlike in the main olfactory system, the axons that leave the accessory olfactory bulb do not project to the brain's cortex but rather to targets in the amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and from there to the hypothalamus, where they may influence aggression and mating behavior. == In insects == Insect olfaction refers to the function of chemical receptors that enable insects to detect and identify volatile compounds for foraging, predator avoidance, finding mating partners (via pheromones) and locating oviposition habitats. Thus, it is the most important sensation for insects.
Evidence against · 1
cited by 0
animal species like reptiles and amphibians exhibit a specific tissue that detects most pheromones: the vomeronasal organ (VNO), situated in the rostral (anterior) nasal cavity. The VNO contains bipolar receptor cells, and its axonal nerve projections traverse the nasal septum and cross the cribriform plate to terminate in the accessory olfactory bulb, adjacent to - yet unconnected with- the main olfactory bulb ( Fig. 2 ). Fig. 2. The putative vomeronasal organ (VNO) in humans. There is no evidence that the VNO is still functioning in human adults. Figure reproduced from Monti-Bloch et al., 1998. Open in a new tab While the human fetus shows a VNO with the typical bipolar cells and axonal projections, most evidence shows that it is functionally inactive after birth. Genes coding for receptor proteins are pseudogenes with no protein expression; bipolar receptor cells are no longer detectable, and the accessory olfactory bulb is absent. Interestingly, GnRH-neurons – pivotal for pubertal development and reproduction – replace the degenerated VNO-nerves as they migrate from the fetal VNO-area to the basal forebrain (Wysocki and Preti, 2004). However, some pheromones in non-human mammals are detected by the “regular” olfactory system rather than by the VNO. For example, the sow response to boar androstenone, alluded to above, was still present after the VNO was blocked with surgical cement (Dorries et al., 1997). Hence, the absence of a functional VNO in human adults does not preclude pheromone perceptive abilities. Human olfaction is as good as that of other mammals but it is consciously underdeveloped and overwhelmingly rated as the least important sense (Sela and Sobel, 2010) – people shamelessly gawp and overlisten but most balk at sniffing. Pheromone detection can improve with practice, as was shown for androstenone (Wysocki et al., 1989). Pheromone solutions are often applied to the skin of study participants. Given that they affect physical parameters including th
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:partial_only:for=0+2p:against=0+1p | v55:contested_partial:lean=lean_partial:even:quality=against

More for · 1
cited by 0
Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of androstadienone, a human pheromone ## Abstract Androstadienone is the most prominent androstene present on male human axillary hair and on the male axillary skin surface. We have previously shown that this volatile steroid is able to stimulate [corrected] the human female vomeronasal organ in picogram (pg) quantities, resulting in changes in autonomic activity. These effects are gender-specific. The purpose of the present study was to ascertain whether androstadienone could be considered a human pheromone by altering behavior as well as autonomic function. Forty normal female subjects were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive either control or 100 pg of androstadienone directly to the vomeronasal organ. We report that administration of this steroid under these conditions results in a significant reduction of nervousness, tension and other negative feeling states. Concordant changes were observed in autonomic physiology. ## Publication types - Clinical Trial - Randomized Controlled Trial ## MeSH terms - Adult - Affect / drug effects - Analysis of Variance - Androstadienes / administration & dosage - Androstadienes / phar
Everything we examined (3) — 2 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Sense of smellreferenceno side taken
  2. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of androstadienone, a human pheromonereferencesame source L54no side taken
  3. Pheromones and their effect on women’s mood and sexuality - PMCofficial-recordsame source L54no side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review11 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt