trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Japanese fishermen put sharks in transport tanks to keep fish fresh.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 1 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Retrieved records indicate that Japanese fishermen do not use sharks to keep fish fresh in transport tanks, but instead rely on specific processing methods such as Ikejime.

Evidence against · 1
2014 · cited by 0
The way most Japanese fishing companies actually do this is a process called Ikejime . There are a few different ways to do this but they are all basically the same cause brain death and/or paralysis in the fish in a specific way, in order to keep the fish fresh. Kaimin Katsugyo which uses acupuncture to keep fish alive but docile, this seems to be much more of a speciality thing though which does make the fish caught this way rather valuable. Fish caught this way are usually sold to higher end sushi restaurants. Although with this method I can't find any documents produced by actual fisheries that use this method. One actual Ikejime method recommended by the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Fisheries Working Group for air transport is: a cut is made toward the front of the flatfish severing the major artery and the spinal cord. Placement of the cut is made to preserve the greate
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:single_source:for=0+0p:against=1+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Do Japanese fishermen put sharks in their tanks to keep fish fresh?referenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review12 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt