trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Adaptation to low light in one eye affects the low-light adaptation of the other eye
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Published literature reports that adaptation or light exposure in one eye can produce interocular effects on the dark adaptation and sensitivity of the contralateral eye.

Evidence for · 2
1969 · cited by 24
Presentation of light to the left eye simultaneously with adaptation of the right eye to light may accelerate dark adaptation in the right eye. The result is that the rod-cone-break and the final threshold of the rods are achieved earlier than when the right eye alone is adapted to light.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:for=2+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 1
1992 · cited by 9
AbstractThresholds for detection of light by a dark-adapted test eye were measured while the other, non-test eye was either similarly dark adapted or while it was exposed to an intense red adapting field. An interocular effect that depends on the retinal location of the test was found: compared to the threshold during binocular dark adaptation, sensitivity decreased during contralateral light adaptation when the test was presented to the foveola and up to 4 deg above it; but sensitivity increased when the test was between 7 and 12 deg, showing a reversal at 5 deg.
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Changes in sensitivity of the dark-adapted eye during concurrent light adaptation of the other eyepeer-reviewedno side taken
  2. Dark Adaptation: An Interocular Light-Adaptation Effectpeer-reviewedno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 004 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt