Comparative philosophy presupposes a degree of cultural relativism across philosophical traditions.
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Retrieved academic overviews and encyclopedic entries indicate that comparative philosophy engages with distinct cultural and linguistic traditions and grapples with problems of incommensurability and standards of evaluation, though they do not explicitly establish the broader philosophical claim of inherent cultural relativism.
Now revised and updated to showcase the most recent developments in the field, this second edition engages with philosophies beyond the Anglo-European tradition and features: · Examples of cross-cultural philosophy from a wider range of ...
What standards should we use to evaluate culturally distinct philosophies? What kind of barrier does language or cultural difference pose in our attempts to understand other traditions? How do we avoid our comparisons being biased? Doing Philosophy Comparatively answers these questions by providing a thorough overview of the methodology involved in extending philosophy across linguistic and cultural boundaries. Now revised and updated to showcase the most recent developments in the field, this second edition engages with philosophies beyond the Anglo-European tradition and features: · Examples of cross-cultural philosophy from a wider range of non-Western traditions · Methodological innovations from works of comparative philosophy published in the last decade · Focused exercises for each c
Doing Philosophy Comparatively: Foundations, Problems, and Methods of Cross-Cultural Inquiry by Tim Connolly - Books on Google Play Doing Philosophy Comparatively: Foundations, Problems, and Methods of Cross-Cultural Inquiry Tim Connolly Dec 2022 · Bloomsbury Publishing Ebook 312 Pages Rp 451.493 Rp 316.045 Buy Free sample Add to wishlist What standards should we use to evaluate culturally distinct philosophies? What kind of barrier does language or cultural difference pose in our attempts to understand other traditions? How do we avoid our comparisons being biased?
Doing Philosophy Comparatively answers these questions by providing a thorough overview of the methodology involved in extending philosophy across linguistic and cultural boundaries.
Now revised and updated to showcase the most recent developments in the field, this second edition engages with philosophies beyond the Anglo-European tradition and features: · Examples of cross-cultural philosophy from a wider range of non-Western traditions · Methodological innovations from works of comparative philosophy published in the last decade · Focused exercises for each chapter demonstrating how to interact meaningfully with primary texts and engage with recent debates in comparative philosophy · Updated discussion questions and readings Introducing the main problems, methods, and approaches of comparative philosophy, this new edition shows you how to make informed cross-cultural judgments through reflection and practice.
It remains an essential toolkit for the practice of doing comparative philosophy. What standards should we use to evaluate culturally distinct philosophies? What kind of barrier does language or cultural difference pose in our attempts to understand other traditions? How do we avoid our comparisons being biased? Doing Philosophy Comparatively answers these questions by provid... See more about this book Tim Connolly is Professor of the Department of Modern Languages, Philosophy, and Religion at East Stroudsburg University, USA. Tim Connolly is Professor of the Department of Modern Languages, Philosophy, and Religion at East Stroudsburg University, USA.
flag Flag as inappropriate Doing Philosophy Comparatively: Foundations, Problems, and Methods of Cross-Cultural Inquiry Tim Connolly Rp 451.493 Rp 316.045 Doing Philosophy Comparatively Tim Connolly Rp 645.374 Rp 451.762 Doing Philosophy Comparatively Tim Connolly Rp 645.374 Rp 451.762 The Things You Can See Only When You Slow Down: How to Be Calm in a Busy World Haemin Sunim Health, mind & body 4.8 star Rp 350.625 Rp 245.437 Love for Imperfect Things: How to Accept Yourself in a World Striving for Perfection Haemin Sunim Health, mind & body 4.8 star Rp 303.935 Rp 212.754 When Things Don't Go Your Way: Zen Wisdom for Difficult Times Haemin Sunim Health, mind & body 4.6 star Rp 116.995 Rp 79.557 The Logic of Scientific Discovery: Edition 2 Karl Popper Science & math 4.4 star Rp 816.816 Rp 653.449
Comparative Philosophy: Chinese and Western (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
# Comparative Philosophy: Chinese and Western
First published Tue Jul 31, 2001; substantive revision Thu Sep 5, 2024
Comparative philosophy originated from bringing together philosophical traditions that are perceived to have developed in relative isolation from one another and that are defined quite broadly along cultural and regional lines – Chinese versus Western, for example. For this reason, several main issues about the commensurability of philosophical traditions have constituted much of the early subject matter of comparative philosophy. Doing comparative philosophy well can be very difficult because of the vast range of texts and their intellectual and historical contexts it requires its practitioners to cover. Oversimplifications, excessively stark contrasts, and illicit assimilations count as the most frequent sins. One benefit of comparative philosophy lies in the way that it forces reflection on the most deeply entrenched and otherwise unquestioned agendas and assumptions of one’s own tradition. Demands for rigor and depth of scholarship obviously r
Comparative Philosophy | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
# Comparative Philosophy
Comparative philosophy—sometimes called “cross-cultural philosophy”—is a subfield of philosophy in which philosophers work on problems by intentionally setting into dialogue various sources from across cultural, linguistic, and philosophical streams. The ambition and challenge of comparative philosophy is to include all the philosophies of global humanity in its vision of what is constituted by philosophy.
This approach distinguishes comparative philosophy from several other approaches to philosophy. First, comparative philosophy is distinct from both area studies philosophy (in which philosophers investigate topics in particular cultural traditions, for example, Confucianism) and world philosophy (in which philosophers construct a philosophical system based on the fullness of global traditions of thought). Second, comparative philosophy differs from more traditional philosophy in which ideas are compared among thinkers within a particular tradition; comparative philosophy intentionally compares the ideas of thinkers of very different traditions, especially culturally distinct traditions.
With
Everything we examined (4) — 3 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.