trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Aristotle argued for the ultimate uselessness of metaphysics
the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - the weight sits with the supporting side
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

The source notes that Aristotle argued prime matter was unknowable and useless for explaining how things come into being, which is a specific aspect of his metaphysics rather than a general argument for the ultimate uselessness of all metaphysics.

Evidence for · 1
Philosophy
2010 · cited by 0
The Classic Readings David E. Cooper, Peter S. Fosl. Aristotle , Metaphysics ... argued that ultimate or " prime " matter was anyway unknow- able , and hence ... useless for explaining how things come into being ( Ch . 8 ) . Cooper and Fosl provide a comprehensive, single-volume collection of the major works of Eastern and Western philosophers from ancient to modern times. They offer an inclusive collection of the greatest philosophical works that draw on both Eastern and Western philosophical traditions.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency | v55:coherence_repaired:what=both

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Philosophyreferenceno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt