trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Archaeological records identify the oldest known board game for three or more players.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Archaeological sources indicate that the ancient Egyptian game Mehen, dating back to pre-dynastic times with evidence supporting up to six players, is considered the oldest known board game for three or more players.

Evidence for · 1
2018 · cited by 0
That honour probably goes to the Ancient Egyptian game, Mehen which dates back to pre-dynastic times. The rules of the game are not known, but surviving examples have been found with up to six playing pieces, and it is believed that these were counters for up to 6 players. An instance of the game being played by a group of four players is portrayed in a scene from the tomb of Rashepses , Vizier to the Fifth Dynasty Pharaoh Djedkare Isesi : The hieroglyphic inscriptions above the players on either side of the board simply read hꜤa mHn or " playing Mehen ". The game of Mehen is discussed in some detail in a paper by Timothy Kendall (available as a pdf download from Academia.edu (registration required)). This paper includes the image of the game being played, from the tomb of Rashepses mentioned above, as figure 4.16. A modern version of the game, with a board broadly identical in form , is
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. What is the oldest known board game for 3+ people?referenceno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt