Phonetic conditioning environments determine the realization of the cloth lexical set
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Linguistic references confirm that the realization of the cloth lexical set is determined by specific phonetic conditioning environments, such as preceding or following phonemes like /f/, /θ/, /s/, /ŋ/, and /ɡ/.
# "Cloth" lexical set: Is there a complete description of the possible conditioning environments?
Tags: english, phonology, historical-linguistics, american-english
- Score: 6
- Views: 1918
- Answers: 2
- Answered: yes
- Asked by: brass tacks (19570 rep)
- Asked: 2016-02-11
- Edited: 2017-04-13
- Site: linguistics
## Question
This question is about speakers without the cot-caught merger (so, speakers who pronounce words such as “lot,” “cot,” “swat" with a distinct vowel from words such as “thought,” “caught,” “water.”) I’ll use broad phonemic transcriptions of the British vowel in “lot” as /ɒ/, the American vowel in “lot” as /ɑ/, and the vowel in “thought” for any speaker as /ɔ/.
Usually, the British phoneme /ɒ/ corresponds to the American phoneme /ɑ/; this is the definition of the “LOT” lexical set. There are known patterns of exceptions where the American phoneme may be /ɔ/ instead, such as before /r/ (where Americans have /ɑ/ or /ɔ/ depending on the word, with some variation also by dialect) and before the phonemes /f/, /θ/, /s/, /ŋ/, /ɡ/, and a few unpatterned exceptions for some speakers such as “chocolate,” “on” and “gone.” Generally, these words are called the “CLOTH” l