trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Analogs to the Kármán line can be calculated for other celestial bodies
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Discussions on physics forums explain that Kármán line equivalents can be derived for other planets, with specific calculations demonstrated for Mars.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
# Karman line analog on other celestial bodies Tags: terminology, karman-line - Score: 23 - Views: 2101 - Answers: 4 - Answered: yes - Asked by: user54 - Asked: 2013-09-23 - Edited: 2020-01-28 - Site: space ## Question Is there a common definition of where the space begins on other planets (and other celestial bodies)? An equivalent of the Karman line. How far one should go from the martian surface to get to the outer space? Am I already in space jumping 2 meters above the Moon surface? (please don't answer that anything beyond the earthly Karman line (including any other planets' surfaces) is in space by definition). ## Answers ### Answer by Mark Adler (score: 18) I am not aware of anyone using a Kármán line on another planet, but it's not hard to calculate. I get about 88 km for Mars. The equation is $r\,\rho(r)={2m\over A\,C_L}$, where $r$ is the radius of the Kármán line from the center of the body, $\rho$ is the density as a function of the radius, $m$ is the mass of the aircraft, $A$ is the planform area, and $C_L$ is the coefficient of lift. von Kármán picked some representative values for $m\over A$ and $C_L$, which I don't know. But I don't need to know. I can
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Karman line analog on other celestial bodiesreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 001 Aug 2026
held for human review11 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt