Women statistically possess better multitasking abilities than men

the verdict

REFUTED

the evidence says no

Recorded sources

0 sources for · 4 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Controlled empirical studies consistently find no evidence to support the popular belief that women possess superior multitasking abilities compared to men.

The analysis

The claim asserts that women statistically possess better multitasking abilities than men. Multiple empirical studies (Papers 0, 1, 2, and 7) specifically tested this stereotype using various paradigms (dual-task, task-switching, everyday scenarios) and found either no significant differences or a slight advantage for men in certain concurrent tasks, directly contradicting the claim. Therefore, the evidence refutes the claim.

Evidence against · 4

Gender differences in multitasking experience and performance.

Recorded source metadata

Kelvin Fh Lui, Ken Hm Yip, Alan C-N Wong. Gender differences in multitasking experience and performance.. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820960707

The study found that men actually showed a smaller concurrent multitasking cost than women, explained by differences in processing speed.

Source citation format

See more details

More against · 3

FMRI to probe sex-related differences in brain function with multitasking.

Recorded source metadata

Melanie Tschernegg, Christa Neuper, Reinhold Schmidt, Guilherme Wood, Martin Kronbichler, Franz Fazekas, Christian Enzinger, Marisa Koini. FMRI to probe sex-related differences in brain function with multitasking.. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181554

Behavioral measures revealed no performance differences between men and women in dual-tasking conditions.

Source citation format

No sex difference in an everyday multitasking paradigm.

Recorded source metadata

Marco Hirnstein, Frank Larøi, Julien Laloyaux. No sex difference in an everyday multitasking paradigm.. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1045-0

Testing participants in an everyday multitasking scenario revealed no significant sex differences across various accuracy and performance measures.

Source citation format

Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations.

Recorded source metadata

Patricia Hirsch, Iring Koch, Julia Karbach. Putting a stereotype to the test: The case of gender differences in multitasking costs in task-switching and dual-task situations.. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220150

Experimental testing across multiple dual-task and task-switching paradigms found no performance differences between genders, contradicting the stereotype.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked31 Jul 2026

judged → REFUTED · 031 Jul 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt