trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Water swirls in opposite directions in the northern and southern hemispheres.

the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
Recorded sources
0 sources for · 2 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

While popular culture often repeats the myth that water drains or flushes in opposite directions depending on the hemisphere due to the Coriolis effect, scientific consensus and empirical evidence confirm this is false for small-scale household basins.

How claims like this are judged

Judged against fact-checker rulings and reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the fact-checking record, not journal abstracts.

Evidence against · 2
Recorded source metadata

Wikipedia: Coriolis force. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_force

Reference article covering this claim directly

See more details
More against · 1
Recorded source metadata

snopes.com: Does the Coriolis Effect Determine Which Direction Water Goes Down a Drain? | Snopes.com. snopes.com. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/coriolis-effect/

Fact-checker ruling: reviewed

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1031 Jul 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt