trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Vote buying was a common and documented practice in early American elections
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

A historical source explicitly reports that vote buying was very common in nineteenth-century American elections.

Evidence for · 2
cited by 0
To incur a cost to participate in an activity; especially, in a corrupt way.: <!--election campaign spending examples: whether vote-buying or just massive ad-buying--> #* {{quote-book |en |year=1986 |author=United States Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations |authorlink=United States Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations |chapter= |title=The Transformation in American Politics: Implications for Federalism |publisher=United States Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations |page=246-247 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4pSHAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA247&dq=%22gotta+pay+to+play%22&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0#v=onepage&q=%22gotta%20pay%20to%20play%22&f=false |passage=Whether or not the father of our country was prone to campaign overkill , the above points up the fact that running for public office has long required the expenditure of resources. Although the use of libations has largely given way to the use of television as a means of capturing votes, the principle remains the same: You gotta pay to play. Nonetheless, as Tables 7-1, 7-2, and 7-3 illustrate, one component of the campaign money game does change with each election—the price tag keeps getting larger.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+1p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 1
2017 · cited by 0
... vote buying , and dishonesty of the election officials were very common in 19th century America , but only a few ... early American variety . In the 1844 elections in New York city , the turnout was declared to be 135 percent ... This title was first published in 2001. Rigging elections in favour of those in power has become a common practice in Bangladesh. Muhammad Yeahia Akhter focuses on the significance of elections in this ostensibly democratic state and portrays how electoral corruption has damaged the process of democratic consolidation. The author reveals the failure of both civilian and military governments to obtain democratic legitimacy and/or credibility through free and fair elections. The study examines the relatively democratic, but largely non-transparent nature of electioneering under non-partisan caretaker governments. The study provides a source of understanding of fair electoral process for the politicians and electoral officials in Bangladesh and other democratizing polities. It provides valuab
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Wiktionary: pay to playreferenceno side taken
  2. Electoral Corruption in Bangladeshreferenceno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt