Trust Me Bro: the receipt

trustme.bro/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

Virtual images cannot be projected onto screens while real images can.

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

refutedsupported

the weight of evidence

1 source for · 0 against

AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Reference literature establishes that real images can be projected onto a surface or screen, whereas virtual images cannot be shown on a surface.

Evidence for · 1

The American Practical Navigator/Glossary

cited by 0

and is capable of being shown on a surface, as in a camera; while a virtual image cannot be shown on a surface, but is visible, as in a mirror. 2. A visual

citation format

See more details

The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)

This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.

The American Practical Navigator/Glossaryreferenceno side taken

More receipts

Is it true that The chemical element osmium has atomic number 76.?Is it true that Rhodium has atomic number 45.?Is it true that Charlotte Bronte's novel Jane Eyre was first published in 1847.?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: the research is thin, dig deeper

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt