trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Updated ionic radii datasets supersede Shannon's 1976 compilation in modern crystallography.
the verdict
OVERSTATED
true in a weaker form than the claim states
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against

Modern studies suggest specific refinements to individual ionic radii values from Shannon's 1976 compilation rather than a complete supersession of the full dataset.

what the evidence does support

Provide a comprehensive textbook reference or compilation study explicitly establishing that Shannon's 1976 ionic radii compilation has been completely replaced across modern crystallography.

Evidence for · 1
2025 · cited by 2
Abstract The ionic radii of rare earth elements (REE: Sc, Y, and the lanthanides) are key to interpreting partitioning behavior between minerals and melts for use as petrogenetic tracers and thermometry. Of REE, Y commonly has the highest concentration and serves as a reference against which other REE concentrations or partition coefficients can be compared. Here, we show that published experimental data on mineral-melt partitioning of REE imply the ionic radius of Y3+ is smaller than commonly assumed by 0.001 Å for sixfold coordination to 0.005 Å for eightfold and ninefold coordination. This difference reconciles the partitioning behavior of Y3+ with that of other REE and improves reference states for interpreting trace element systematics in rocks. Thermobarometry can be highly sensitive to assumed ionic radii, and downward correction of the Y3+ ionic radius improves some REE-based temperatures by hundreds of degrees. Future studies that employ the most common tabulations of ionic radii of the REE (Shannon 1976) should use an ionic radius of Y3+ of 0.899, 1.014, and 1.070 Å for six-, eight-, and ninefold coordination, respectively; alternatively, the ionic radius of Y can be scaled to that of Ho3+ × 0.9984. More generally, trace element partitioning data, coupled with theoretical models, provide an exact method for refining effective relative ionic radii in minerals where direct structural determinations are not possible.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency | v55:coherence_repaired:what=both | v55:overstated

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Revision of Y3+ ionic radii in common minerals based on trace element partitioningpeer-reviewedno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review07 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt