Trust Me Bro: the receipt

trustme.bro/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

Ultrasound devices effectively repel household pests

the verdict

REFUTED

the evidence says no

confidence 16/100

Scientific studies evaluating ultrasonic pest repellers have consistently found that these devices lack sufficient efficacy to control household pests or other animals.

Evidence against · 2

The Efficacy of Ultrasonic Pest Repellent Devices against the Australian Paralysis Tick, Ixodes holocyclus (Acari: Ixodidae)

2021 · cited by 10

The study tested nine ultrasonic devices against ticks and concluded that the devices are ineffective and should not be employed in pest management.

citation format

See more details

More against · 1

Efficacy Testing of an Ultrasonic Bird Repeller

1988 · cited by 1

The study evaluated a sonic-ultrasonic device and found it had no significant repelling effect on bird behavior.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → REFUTED · 1601 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Female sex hormones influence the coagulation cascade to promote blood clotting?Is it true that An insulin injection in a non-diabetic causes severe hypoglycemia?Is it true that Plant seeds benefit from being buried in the soil?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: the research is thin, dig deeper

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt