Trust Me Bro: the receipt

trustme.bro/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

Two different utility functions represent the same preferences if one is a monotonic transformation of the other

the verdict

COMMON KNOWLEDGE

no citation needed for this one

refutedsupported

the weight of evidence

no sources on either side

The retrieved evidence items do not address the foundational microeconomic definition regarding monotonic transformations of utility functions, which is standard economic theory.

See more details

The analysis

v55:common_knowledge_bare

More receipts

Is it true that The chemical element osmium has atomic number 76.?Is it true that Rhodium has atomic number 45.?Is it true that Charlotte Bronte's novel Jane Eyre was first published in 1847.?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: the research is thin, dig deeper

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt