trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
True Mendelian traits exist that do not display polygeny
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
7 sources for · 0 against

Multiple genetic and clinical studies confirm the existence of true Mendelian traits that follow single-gene inheritance patterns without a polygenic basis, such as monogenic disorders and specific phenotypic traits like earwax type.

Evidence for · 7
2017 · cited by 142
Paper 0 notes that breeding is straightforward when traits are monogenic and show Mendelian inheritance, contrasting them with polygenic traits.
See more details
The analysis

The claim states that true Mendelian traits exist that do not display polygeny. Numerous papers in the literature discuss monogenic Mendelian disorders and single-gene traits (such as the ABCC11 earwax polymorphism or familial chylomicronemia syndrome) as distinct from complex polygenic traits. All relevant papers support the existence of monogenic Mendelian inheritance. Therefore, the verdict is SUPPORTED.

More for · 6
2019 · cited by 17
Paper 2 notes that OMIA and OMIM database records document thousands of single-gene Mendelian disorders.
2023 · cited by 14
Paper 3 states that monogenic disorders account for substantial percentages of certain diseases, distinct from polygenic traits.
2024 · cited by 12
Paper 5 highlights that OMIA focuses on Mendelian traits and their causal mutations in animals.
2019 · cited by 6
Paper 7 describes familial chylomicronemia syndrome as a monogenic disorder caused by mutations in single genes, contrasting with polygenic hypertriglyceridemia.
2025 · cited by 3
Paper 9 notes that monogenic diseases result from pathogenic variants in a single gene with large effects, unlike polygenic diseases.
2025 · cited by 2
Paper 11 demonstrates that the ABCC11 earwax phenotype is determined by a single-nucleotide polymorphism, providing a clear example of a Mendelian trait without polygeny.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8804 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt