trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Travel time to Proxima b with current propulsion technology takes millennia
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Retrieved reference literature notes that a journey to Proxima Centauri at standard rates would take 72,000 years, matching the claim that travel time with current propulsion takes millennia.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
At this rate, a journey to Proxima Centauri would take 72,000 years. Of course, this mission was not specifically intended to travel fast to the stars, and current technology could do much better. The travel time could be reduced to a few millennia using solar sails, or to a century or less using nuclear pulse propulsion. Special relativity offers the possibility of shortening the travel time: if a starship with sufficiently advanced engines could reach velocities near the speed of light, relativistic time dilation would make the voyage much shorter for the traveller. However, it would still take many years of elapsed time as viewed by the people remaining on Earth. On returning to Earth, the travellers would find that far more time had elapsed on Earth than had for them (twin paradox). Many problems would be solved if wormholes existed. General relativity does not rule them out, but so far as we know at present, they do not exist. Communications The round-trip delay time is the minimum time between a probe signal reaching Earth, and the probe getting instructions from Earth.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency | v55:coherence_repaired:what=summary

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Simple English Wikipedia: Interstellar travelreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt