trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Tough-movement constructions involve syntactic raising and a null operator
the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - the weight sits with the supporting side
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
5 sources for · 0 against

Source [0] notes that tough constructions involve wh-movement and a null wh-operator, but distinguishes them from raising constructions, indicating the claim is not fully supported by all listed sources.

Evidence for · 5
2008 · cited by 0
... tough constructions involve some sort of wh-movement, and are in this way distinct from raising constructions ... null wh-operator in the infinitival clause that blocks the extraction of the wh-object of the preposition to. This ... The Grammar of Raising and Control surveys analyses across a range of theoretical frameworks from Rosenbaum's classic Standard Theory analysis (1967) to current proposals within the Minimalist Program, and provides readers with a critical understanding of these, helping them in the process to develop keen insights into the strengths and weaknesses of syntactic arguments in general. Distills a very successful graduate course in syntax from two prominent figures in the field, covering analyses from a range of theoretical frameworks. Provides readers with an understanding of the various perspectives represented in generative syntax, using a particular class of grammatical constructions as a means of examining the evolution of syntactic theory over the last thirty years. Helps students to deve
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+4p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency | v55:coherence_repaired:what=both

More for · 4
1992 · cited by 0
Analysis middle constructions in English, accounting for their key syntactic and semantic properties. The analysis rests on the observation that there are certain similarities between middle, "tough," and recipe-context null-object constructions. (55 references) (VWL)
2012 · cited by 0
... null operators) and PF ellipsis/deletion processes when trying to account for a number of elliptical constructions like Right-Node-Raising ... movement which dispense with many of the null categories and ellipsis/deletion operations of ... This volume addresses some of the most important approaches to the following key questions in contemporary generative syntactic theory: What are the operations available for (syntactic) structure-building in natural languages? What are the triggers behind them? and Which constraints are involved in the operations? Internationally recognised scholars and young researchers propose new answers on the basis of detailed discussions of a wide range of phenomena (Gapping, Right-Node-Raising, Comparative Deletion, Across-The-Board movement, Tough-constructions, Nominalizations, Scope interactions, Wh-movement, A-movement, Case and Agreement relations, among others). Their discussions draw on evidence from a rich variety of languages, including Brazilian Portuguese, Bulgarian, Croatian, English, Ge
2017 · cited by 0
The dissertation was inspired by the question of why subjects cannot undergo tough movement (1). (1) a. Jonathan Franzen is easy for Anneke to criticize b. *Anneke is easy - to criticize Jonathan Franzen. To answer this question, this dissertation proposes that a spec-to-spec anti-locality constraint (in the spirit of Erlewine 2016 and Brillman & Hirsh to appear) limits subject tough movement because the subject tough movement chain is "too short." Brillman & Hirsh's spec-to-spec anti-locality constraint is given in (2). Spec-to-spec anti-locality bans subject tough movement because subject tough movement would need to involve A movement from the embedded spec-TP to the immediately adjacent spec-CP. This movement chain is banned by spec-to-spec anti-locality. (2) Spec-to-Spec Anti-Locality A-movement of a phrase from the specifier of XP must cross a specifier projected by a maximal projection other than XP. Movement from position a to 3 crosses y if and only if y dominates a but does not dominate 3 A spec-to-spec anti-locality analysis of the ban on subject tough movement also provides an explanation for why gapped degree phrases, a syntactic structure that shows many parallels to tough constructions (Lasnik & Fiengo 1974) can license subject movement (3). This dissertation will show that, compared to tough constructions, gapped degree phrases have a structurally "larger" embedded clause, with a DegP layer dominating the CP layer. This DegP layer contains a syntactically and
2023 · cited by 0
In this dissertation, I investigate the apparently distinctive syntactic properties associated with the BEI-construction, the BA-construction, and resultative constructions in Mandarin Chinese, which I argue obscure properties that are universal across natural languages. In the case of the Mandarin BEI-construction, it exhibits both passive-like and tough-movementlike properties. I argue for a novel analysis of the BEI-construction as a passive construction, where the passive head/BEI hosts a composite probe [𝜙 + Ā], which triggers composite A/Ā-movement, in the sense of Van Urk (2015). The su
Everything we examined (5) — 4 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. The Grammar of Raising and Controlreferencesame source L1no side taken
  2. Null Objects and Non-Thematic Subjects.peer-reviewedno side taken
  3. Ways of Structure Buildingreferencesame source L1no side taken
  4. Tough constructions in the context of English infinitivespeer-reviewedno side taken
  5. Obscured universality in Mandarinreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 3505 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt