trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Three polarizers oriented 45 degrees apart transmit light according to Malus's law
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Retrieved physics discussions and academic analyses confirm that light passing through three polarizers oriented 45 degrees apart follows Malus's law.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
# Three polarizers, 45° apart Tags: optics, laser, polarization - Score: 43 - Views: 57120 - Answers: 7 - Answered: yes - Asked by: vaindil (587 rep) - Asked: 2013-04-22 - Site: physics ## Question If light is passed through two polarizing filters before arriving at a target, and both of the filters are oriented at 90° to each other, then no light will be received at the target. If a third filter is added between the first two, oriented at a 45° angle (as shown below), light will reach the target. Why is this the case? As I understand it, a polarized filter does nothing except filter out light--it does not alter the light passing through in any way. If two filters exist that will eliminate all of the light, why does the presence of a third, which should serve only to filter out additional light, actually act to allow light through? ## Answers ### Answer by Jim (score: 28 [ACCEPTED]) This link: http://alienryderflex.com/polarizer/ has an excellent explanation; much better than anything I could write here. Essentially, it says that this occurs because the 45 degree filter outputs a projection of the vertical rays at 45 degrees. This, in turn, has a horizontal component, whic
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Three polarizers, 45° apart - Physics Stack Exchangereferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9501 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt