There is a rigorous mathematical proof for the energy-time uncertainty principle

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Rigorous mathematical formulations and proofs exist for specific interpretations of the energy-time uncertainty principle, such as the Mandelstam-Tamm inequality.

The analysis

The retrieved literature includes specific papers (such as [0] and [2]) that demonstrate rigorous mathematical formulations and derivations of the energy-time uncertainty principle, supporting the claim.

Evidence for · 2

Mathematical analysis of the Mandelstam–Tamm time-energy uncertainty principle

Recorded source metadata

John E. Gray, Andrew Vogt. Mathematical analysis of the Mandelstam–Tamm time-energy uncertainty principle. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1897164

Paper [0] provides mathematical analysis and confirms that the Mandelstam–Tamm time-energy uncertainty inequality can be established rigorously, achieving equality for certain observables.

Source citation format

See more details

More for · 1

Time Energy Uncertainty Principle and Vacuum Fluctuations

Recorded source metadata

Mirza Wasif BAig. Time Energy Uncertainty Principle and Vacuum Fluctuations. 2019. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201901.0292.v1

Paper [2] mathematically models and derives the time-energy uncertainty principle by calculating the variance of energy and time for wave functions.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8201 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt