variants of the standard list of fallacies (“misleading vividness” designating the misuse of vivid anecdotal ... but are at the same time, members of a broader family of informal logics that adopt the fallacy approach ... = {B,L, A ,S,T}, where: B = Fallacy Theory, and T = a set of fallacies used to judge instances of argument ...
statement unqualified to the statement qualified). It is a type of informal fallacy that occurs when the arguer omits the fact that a statement applies with
Secundum quid (comes from the Latin "a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid", meaning "[what is true] in a certain respect and [what is true] absolutely" or "from the statement unqualified to the statement qualified).
It is a type of informal fallacy that occurs when the arguer omits the fact that a statement applies with qualifications or exceptions, or fails to recognize the difference betw
Secundum quid (comes from the Latin "a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid", meaning "[what is true] in a certain respect and [what is true] absolutely" or "from the statement unqualified to the statement qualified).
It is a type of informal fallacy that occurs when the arguer omits the fact that a statement applies with qualifications or exceptions, or fails to recognize the difference between rules of thumb (soft generalizations, heuristics that hold true as a general rule but leave room for exceptions) and categorical propositions, rules that hold true universally.
Since it ignores the limits, or qualifications, of rules of thumb, this fallacy is also named ignoring qualifications or sweeping generalizations. The expression misuse of a principle can be used as well.
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.