There are valid theoretical and empirical arguments against the rational expectations hypothesis
Substantial theoretical and empirical work demonstrates that relaxing the assumption of rational expectations in favor of bounded rationality or behavioral models better accounts for real-world market dynamics, cognitive biases, and economic anomalies.
The claim states that there are valid theoretical and empirical arguments against the rational expectations hypothesis. Papers [1], [6], and [8] directly critique classical rational choice or efficient market/rational expectations frameworks, demonstrating the validity and utility of bounded rationality and behavioral economic models. The claim is specific, falsifiable, and well-supported by the provided literature.
Montañez Jacquez S, Clippinger JH, Moroney M. Agentic Finance: An Adaptive Inference Framework for Bounded-Rational Investing Agents.. 2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/e28030321
Demonstrates that adaptive inference models using bounded-rational agents outperform strict classical rationality/valuation assumptions under uncertainty.
See more details
Xu S, Zhou Y, Xu S, Liu J, Chen Q, Xue F, Zhu W. Decision-making of construction workers' waste reduction behavior: a study based on Cost-Benefit Theory and Cumulative Prospect Theory.. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1557736
Integrates Cumulative Prospect Theory to model cognitive biases and departures from standard rational choice in economic decision-making.
Benjamin Patrick Evans, Mikhail Prokopenko. Bounded strategic reasoning explains crisis emergence in multi-agent market games.. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221164
Critiques the rational expectations and efficient market hypothesis for failing to model out-of-equilibrium dynamics, proposing bounded rationality as a superior explanation for market crises.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
Challenge the receipt
Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt