There are right-branching agglutinative languages in human linguistic typology
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Linguistic reference materials and discussions note examples like Elamite which demonstrate that right-branching agglutinative languages exist within typological classifications.
# Are there right-branching agglutinative languages?
Tags: syntax-trees, list-of-languages, morphosyntax, agglutination, agglutinative-languages
- Score: 7
- Views: 1196
- Answers: 2
- Answered: yes
- Asked by: Adam Bittlingmayer (8639 rep)
- Asked: 2016-09-03
- Edited: 2016-09-05
- Site: linguistics
## Question
The major agglutinative languages like Turkish and Japanese are also notable for being almost strictly left-branching, much more so than, say, English is right-branching.
Is it a coincidence, or is there a relationship or correlation between agglutination and branching directionality (head directionality)?
What are some examples of mostly right-branching agglutinative languages, if any?
I am specifically interested in a language that uses prefixes and prepositions for agglutination, rather than suffixes and postpositions.
## Answers
### Answer by fdb (score: 3)
Elamite is agglutinative and (mainly) right-branching, though quotative phrases are left branching.
https://archive.org/stream/TheElamiteLanguage1969/Reiner1969TheElamiteLanguagetext#page/n15/mode/2up
### Answer by melissa_boiko (score: 1)
I'm unsure by what we even mean by "mainly" or "mostly" right- or