trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
There are an infinite number of possible thoughts
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Peer-reviewed philosophical and scientific literature explicitly supports the proposition that the number of possible thoughts is infinite.

Evidence for · 2
OpenAIRE: How many thoughts are there? Or why we likely have no Tegmark duplicates $$ 10^{{10^{115} }} $$ m away
2011 · cited by 0
Explicitly argues that possible thoughts are infinite in number.
See more details
The analysis

Judged against the evidence record for claims of this kind.

More for · 1
OpenAIRE: Supervenience Physicalism and the Berry Paradox
2021 · cited by 0
Discusses arguments that the number of possible thoughts is infinite.
Everything we examined (10) — 8 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Wikipedia: Thoughtreferencesame source L1no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  2. Wikipedia: Infinite monkey theoremreferencesame source L1no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. Voices in Bioethics: Brain Imaging and Diagnosispeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  4. مجله مطالعات ایرانی: A Study of the Concepts of Aesthetics in Mathnavi-e Manavi Based on Theories of Deep Structurepeer-reviewedsame source L3no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  5. OpenAIRE: How many thoughts are there? Or why we likely have no Tegmark duplicates $$ 10^{{10^{115} }} $$ m awaypeer-reviewedsupports
  6. OpenAIRE: Supervenience Physicalism and the Berry Paradoxpeer-reviewedsupports
  7. OpenAIRE: REPEATING AS A METHOD OF FORMATION IN A MUSIC WORKpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  8. OpenAIRE: On Super-Turing Computing Power and Hierarchies of Artificial General Intelligence Systemspeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. OpenAIRE: The Nexus 4 Recursive Harmonic Framework: A Computational Architecture of Realitypeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. OpenAIRE: A Study of the Concepts of Aesthetics in Mathnavi-e Manavi Based on Theories of Deep Structurepeer-reviewedsame source L3no side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 6305 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt