trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test uses a specific deck of 64 stimulus cards.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
4 sources for · 0 against

The retrieved literature consistently confirms the existence and use of a 64-card version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST-64) that utilizes a single deck of cards.

Evidence for · 4
B - 135 Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 64-Card Computer Version (WCST-64-CV) Failure to Maintain Set (FMS) as an Embedded Performance Validity Indicator in a Mixed Clinical Sample
2024 · cited by 1
Paper 0 studies the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 64-Card Computer Version (WCST-64-CV), supporting the existence of a 64-card version.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved papers repeatedly discuss the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 64-card version (WCST-64), explicitly noting that it utilizes a single deck of 64 cards as a shortened alternative to the standard 128-card version. There are no papers contradicting this factual description.

More for · 3
Validity of the WCST-64 after traumatic brain injury.
2003 · cited by 0
Paper 5 describes the WCST-64 as a modification of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test that utilizes only one deck of 64 cards.
Use of the WCST and the WCST-64 in the assessment of traumatic brain injury.
2003 · cited by 0
Paper 7 examines the utility of the 64-card version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST-64).
Validity of the WCST-64 after traumatic brain injury in children.
2004 · cited by 0
Paper 8 notes that the WCST-64 is a modification utilizing only one deck of cards.
Everything we examined (10)
  1. B - 135 Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 64-Card Computer Version (WCST-64-CV) Failure to Maintain Set (FMS) as an Embedded Performance Validity Indicator in a Mixed Clinical Samplepeer-reviewedsupports
  2. การแปลคำทำนายบนไพ่ออราเคิลชุด Soul Truth Self-Awareness Card Deck ของ Brianne Hoveypeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. The utility of the Wisconsin card sorting test, 64-card version to detect noncredible attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  4. Construction and validation of an ecological version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test applied to an elderly population.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  5. [Clinical utility of the 64-card version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in patients with traumatic brain injury].peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. Validity of the WCST-64 after traumatic brain injury.peer-reviewedsupports
  7. Comparability of the standard WCST and WCST-64 in traumatic brain injury.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  8. Use of the WCST and the WCST-64 in the assessment of traumatic brain injury.peer-reviewedsupports
  9. Validity of the WCST-64 after traumatic brain injury in children.peer-reviewedsupports
  10. Monitoring Outcome after Hospital-Presenting Milder Spectrum Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, Pediatric Revision.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7705 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt