trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The verb 'going' has multiple semantic meanings ranging from physical movement to future tense.
the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
no citation needed for this one
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
no sources on either side

The statement that the verb 'going' has multiple meanings ranging from physical movement to future tense is a matter of basic linguistic description and everyday definition, requiring no formal citation.

See more details
The analysis

The claim is trivially true by definition and everyday observation in English grammar and lexicography, fitting the criteria for common knowledge. None of the retrieved papers specifically target or test this standard lexical fact about the word 'going', though the papers generally discuss syntax, tense, and grammaticalization.

Everything we examined (8)
We also searched for evidence AGAINST this claim, not only for it.
  1. Syntax and the brain: language evolution as the missing link(ing theory)?peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  2. Is the future near or far depending on the verb tense markers used? An experimental investigation into the effects of the grammaticalization of the future.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Understanding the Psychological Impact of Different Grammaticalizations of the Future.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  4. The Embodied Simulation of L2 Grammatical Aspect: Proficiency-Dependent Evidence from the Action-Sentence Compatibility Effect.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  5. Corpus linguistics meets historical linguistics and construction grammar: how far have we come, and where do we go from here?peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. MADOran: A morphologically annotated dataset of Oran.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. The development of imperfective and subjunctive marking in Hewramî.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  8. Aspectual reduplication in Sign Language of the Netherlands: reconsidering phonological constraints and aspectual distinctions.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 006 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt