trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The use of coat hangers for clandestine abortions is a historical myth
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 2 against

Medical literature and historical records document that coat hangers were indeed used for unsafe, self-induced abortions when legal procedures were unavailable, making the claim false.

Evidence against · 2
Wikipedia: Abortion
cited by 0
Reference article covering this claim directly
See more details
How claims like this are judged

Judged against fact-checker rulings and reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the fact-checking record, not journal abstracts.

More against · 1
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov: Reemergence of self-induced abortions
cited by 0
A medical case study documents a self-induced abortion attempted using a coat hanger.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1001 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt