trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The submersible DSV Alvin spotted a living plesiosaur
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 1 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Retrieved reference materials show that the claim originates from a paranormal book detailing an unverified anecdotal account, which is classified as a debunked cryptozoology myth rather than a confirmed scientific observation.

Evidence against · 1
cited by 0
# Did the submersible 'DSV Alvin' spot a living plesiosaur? - Tags: cryptozoology - Score: 14 - Views: 5,513 - Answers: 1 - Asked by: user53407 - Asked on: Apr 29, 2021 - Last active: Apr 29, 2021 - License: CC BY-SA 4.0 --- ## Question Famed paranormal author [Charles Berlitz](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Berlitz) wrote a 1977 book, _Without a Trace_, in which he claimed that a Captain Marvin McCamis claimed to have seen a plesiosaur-like sea creature from a submarine, _[DSV Alvin](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DSV_Alvin)_ at 300 ft: > "...I was astonished to see a thick body with flippers, a long neck, a snakelike head with two eyes looking right at us. It looked like a big lizard with flippers - it had two sets of them. Then it swam upwards with its back turned before we could get the cameras angled. They were set to photograph 15 to 25 feet in front of the submarine and the thing had already swum out of the camera angle but was still around." Did this research submersible spot a living plesiosaur at only 300 feet? --- ## Answer 1 — Score: 53 - By: Oddthinking (149,035 rep) - Answered on: Apr 29, 2021 On one hand, it disappoints me that we are still debunking
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:single_source:for=0+0p:against=1+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Did the submersible 'DSV Alvin' spot a living plesiosaur?referenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 2531 Jul 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt