The stress response from neonatal circumcision causes long-term cognitive impairment.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 1 against
A systematic review evaluating evidence on male circumcision explicitly reports that neonatal circumcision has little effect on cognitive ability, despite eliciting a physiological stress response.
Background Suboptimal neonatal circumcision analgesia causes a significant stress response. There is continued search for more effective analgesia for neonatal circumcision. We aimed to determine whether lidocaine–prilocaine cream (LPC) prior to dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) offers better analgesia than DPNB alone.Methods A prospective randomized study of 72 neonates undergoing plastibell circumcision was randomized into two groups of 36 each. Group I received DPNB alone with 4 mg/kg plain lidocaine. Group II had 1 g LPC applied to the phallus 1 hour before DPNB. Serum cortisol levels were measured 30 min preoperatively and 30 min postoperatively. Heart rate (HR) and peripheral arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) were noted at 30 min preoperatively, after DPNB injection, after excising the prepuce, and at 30 min thereafter. The primary outcome measure was change in serum cortisol levels, while secondary outcomes were changes in HR and SpO2.Results Both groups had increased mean serum cortisol levels, decreased mean SpO2 and increased mean HR from baseline. The rise in mean serum cortisol level was significantly lower in group II (8.09±4.53 µg/dL) than that in group I (11.42±7.83 µg/dL) (p=0.034). Changes in SpO2 and HR were significantly less in group II than that in group I patients (p<0.05), except for HR changes at 30 min after excision of the prepuce (p=0.086).Conclusion These data suggest that neonates who received LPC prior to DPNB experienced significantly less pain f
Abstract Objective To conduct the first systematic review critically examining evidence on whether early male circumcision has short‐ and long‐term adverse psychological effects. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Results Twenty‐four studies with original data met the inclusion criteria. These comprised 11,173 total males, 4340 circumcised in infancy and 6908 uncircumcised. Nineteen were rated 1+, 2++ or 2+, and 5 were rated 2– by SIGN criteria. Neonatal circumcision, particularly without anesthetic, increased vaccination pain response, but had little effect on breastfeeding or cognitive ability. Studies reporting associations with sudden infant death syndrome, autism, alexithymia and impaired sexual function and pleasure had design flaws and were rated 2–. Sexual arousal, touch, pain, and warmth thresholds measured by quantitative sensory testing were not diminished in neonatally circumcised men. Neonatal circumcision was not associated with empathy in men, contradicting the hypothesis that procedural pain causes central nervous system changes. After correcting all associations with socioaffective processing parameters for multiple testing only higher sociosexual desire, dyadic sexual libido/drive, and stress remained significant. The relatively greater sexual activity found in circumcised men might reflect reduced sexual activity in uncircumcised men overall owing to pain and psychological aversion in those with foreskin‐relate