trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The San Andreas fault is nearly vertical
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
4 sources for · 0 against

Geophysical studies including seismic imaging, magnetotelluric sounding, and gravity modeling demonstrate that segments of the San Andreas Fault are indeed nearly vertical or steeply dipping in the upper crust.

Evidence for · 4
2015 · cited by 46
Ambient-noise tomography reveals vertical to steeply dipping lateral velocity contrasts across the San Andreas Fault.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved literature consistently supports the claim that the San Andreas fault is nearly vertical or steeply dipping. Papers [0], [3], [9], and [11] all explicitly report geophysical evidence (such as seismic tomography, geodetic and seismic inversions, magnetotelluric imaging, and gravity models) showing that the fault or key sections of it (like the southern San Andreas fault) are vertical to steeply dipping (e.g., 60-80 degrees) in the upper crust. No papers refute the claim, so the verdict is SUPPORTED.

More for · 3
2023 · cited by 14
Data inversions show the southern San Andreas Fault dips to the northeast at 60-80 degrees in the upper crust.
2022 · cited by 6
Magnetotelluric imaging highlights a vertical to steeply northeast dipping fault zone in the upper crust.
2022 · cited by 5
Gravity and magnetic models provide evidence for a steep northeast dip of the San Andreas fault strands.
Everything we examined (12)
  1. San Andreas Fault dip, Peninsular Ranges mafic lower crust and partial melt in the Salton Trough, Southern California, from ambient‐noise tomographypeer-reviewedsupports
  2. What's down there? The structures, materials and environment of deep-seated slow slip and tremor.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  3. Utilizing distributed acoustic sensing and ocean bottom fiber optic cables for submarine structural characterization.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  4. Active Dipping Interface of the Southern San Andreas Fault Revealed by Space Geodetic and Seismic Imagingpeer-reviewedsupports
  5. 3D architecture and complex behavior along the simple central San Andreas faultpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. Abundant off-fault seismicity and orthogonal structures in the San Jacinto fault zone.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. Observation‐Constrained Multicycle Dynamic Models of the Southern San Andreas and the Northern San Jacinto Faults: Addressing Complexity in Paleoearthquake Extent and Recurrence With Realistic 2D Fault Geometrypeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  8. Characteristic activities of slow earthquakes in Japan.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. Earthquakes track subduction fluids from slab source to mantle wedge sink.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. Structural properties of the Southern San Andreas fault zone in northern Coachella Valley from magnetotelluric imagingpeer-reviewedsupports
  11. Coevolving early afterslip and aftershock signatures of a San Andreas fault rupture.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. Insights into the geometry and evolution of the southern San Andreas fault from geophysical data, southern Californiapeer-reviewedsupports
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8605 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt