trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The phrase suck it up originates from WWII pilots
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 1 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Available evidence examining the popular etymology connecting the phrase 'suck it up' to World War II pilots vomiting into oxygen masks finds little support or evidence for the claim.

Evidence against · 1
cited by 0
# Is the origin of the phrase "suck it up" referring to WWII pilots? - Tags: language - Score: 17 - Views: 7,350 - Answers: 1 - Asked by: Jeremy French (660 rep) - Asked on: Apr 29, 2016 - Last active: Aug 26, 2018 - License: CC BY-SA 3.0 --- ## Question I was reading [this New Statesman article](http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2016/04/when-it-comes-labour-and-anti-semitism-there-s-only-so-much-left-wing-jew-can) and was surprised to read this: > The origin of the phrase “suck it up” is quite gross. Allegedly, it’s what WWII pilots were instructed to do if they vomited into their oxygen masks, to avoid drowning in their own puke. I can find little evidence to support this. There is some [talk on wiktionary](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Talk:suck_it_up) and a [related question on the English Language and Usage Stack Exchange](https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/32560/what-does-suck-it-up-and-go-mean). This [usage data](https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=suck+it+up&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Csuck%20it%20up%3B%2Cc0#t1%3B%2Csuck%20it%20up%3B%2Cc1) seems to contradict it as there is very little change
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:single_source:for=0+0p:against=1+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Is the origin of the phrase "suck it up" referring to WWII pilots?referenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 004 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt