The Nuremberg Trials followed specific criteria to determine death sentences versus life imprisonment
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
The available evidence records individual sentences and occasional mentions of circumstances like the presence or absence of extenuating factors, but it does not fully detail a comprehensive set of specific criteria used to distinguish death sentences from life imprisonment at the Nuremberg Trials.
The Law of the Nuremberg Trial | American Journal of International Law | Cambridge Core
Search
---
Institution Login
Search
Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-zbnhx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-16T04:11:31.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
- Français
- English
# The Law of the Nuremberg Trial
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 April 2017
Quincy Wright
Show author details
---
---
Article contents
- References
- Extract
Get access
Share
Cite Rights & Permissions
---
## Extract
On the afternoon of October 1, 1946, the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg sentenced twelve of the twenty-two Nazi defendants to death by hanging and seven to imprisonment for terms ranging from ten years to life. Three were acquitted. Three of the six accused organizations were found to be criminal. The reading of these sentences was preceded by the reading, through the whole of September 30, of the general opinion of the Tribunal on the four counts of the indictment and, on the morning of October 1, of the opinion on the charges against each defendant.1 The Control Council for Germany considered applications for clemency for most of t
# How did the Nuremberg Trials decide whether a guilty defendant was to be sentence to death or life imprisonment?
Tags: world-war-two, nazi-germany, law
- Score: 9
- Views: 1099
- Answers: 1
- Answered: yes
- Asked by: Louis Rhys (6873 rep)
- Asked: 2014-01-12
- Site: history
## Question
This page contains a list of Nuremberg defendants, their verdict and sentence. While explanations for lighter sentence (e.g. Dönitz was only sentenced to 10 years) can be found quite easily, many Nazi leaders were sentenced to death or life imprisonment, and it seems quite arbitrary. What criteria did the trials use to decide whether to sentence someone to death or life imprisonment? Was there a precedent for this distinction?
## Answers
### Answer by PGeerkens (score: 10 [ACCEPTED])
From this summary of the Nuremberg Judgements for major defendants the compilation below is of the finding on Count IV, Crimes against Humanity for each:
Defendant Count IV - Verdict & Circumstance Sentence
Martin Bormann Guilty - no extenuating circumstance death by hanging
Karl Doenitz Not Indicted 10 years imprisonment
Hans Frank Guilty - no extenuating circumstance death by hanging
Wilhelm Frick Guilty - n
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.