trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The normal duration of human sexual intercourse falls within a specific empirical timeframe
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
confidence 84/100

Empirical studies confirm that the duration of human sexual intercourse and related physiological markers fall within specific, measurable timeframes.

Evidence for · 4
What Are the Physical Demands of Sexual Intercourse? A Systematic Review of the Literature
2022 · cited by 23
Paper 1 notes that sexual intercourse has a measurable activity duration that elicits specific physiological demands.
See more details
More for · 3
Duration of Erection: Does It Really Matter? A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial to Assess the Impact of Vardenafil ODT on Duration of Erection and Its Correlation with Patients' and Partners' Sexual Quality of Life and Duration of Intercourse: The VADEOPEN Study
2014 · cited by 13
Paper 3 evaluates stopwatch-assessed duration of erection leading to successful intercourse as an empirical efficacy endpoint.
(125) Efficacy of Hilti Gold vs. Epimedyumlu Macun in Duration of Erection and Its Correlation with Partners ´Sexual Quality of Life
2024 · cited by 1
Paper 7 reports that the average duration of sexual intercourse in healthy men falls within a specific timeframe of nine to ten minutes.
Distribution and relation of arousal to ejaculatory latency time, erection to ejaculation latency time, and intravaginal ejaculation latency time in Indian men: A pilot study
2021 · cited by 0
Paper 10 measures specific empirical latencies such as intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) in clinical studies.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8401 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt