trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The military phrase Still on patrol has a distinct historical origin
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Historical discussions confirm that the phrase originates from World War II naval practices regarding submarines that lost contact during patrols.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
# Origins of "Still on patrol" Tags: united-states, military, tradition, submarine - Score: 7 - Views: 3253 - Answers: 2 - Answered: yes - Asked by: Lassi Veikkonen (151 rep) - Asked: 2017-01-24 - Edited: 2017-01-24 - Site: history ## Question I recently came across an article about a tradition of USN not to consider submarines lost, but rather being on a permanent patrol. After trying to find more information about the topic pretty much everything I could find is this image from Wikipedia. Does anyone have an idea about when and why did this habit originate? ## Answers ### Answer by Oot'n'Boot (score: 8) During WW2, submarines on patrol were out of contact with friendly forces for extended periods of time. Even when operating in a Wolf-Pack, they generally couldn't tell exactly where their pack-mates were or how they were doing. While they could broadcast their status using their radios, this was limited to avoid radio intercepts and direction finding giving away their presence in an area. This meant that more often than not, the first indication that a boat was lost was either a boat missing a radio check-in or the boat being overdue on returning to port (an example of
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Origins of "Still on patrol"referenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 004 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt