trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The lower mass cutoff for core-collapse supernovae in massive stars is approximately eight solar masses
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Multiple studies support the standard astrophysical consensus that core-collapse supernovae originate from massive stars with a lower mass cutoff of approximately eight solar masses.

Evidence for · 2
2018 · cited by 30
This study infers the minimum progenitor mass of core-collapse supernovae to be approximately 7.33 solar masses, closely aligning with the standard eight solar mass cutoff.
See more details
The analysis

The claim states that the lower mass cutoff for core-collapse supernovae is around eight solar masses. Paper [1] estimates the minimum mass at roughly 7.33 solar masses, and Paper [6] references the standard $\ge 8 M_{\odot}$ threshold for massive stars undergoing core-collapse. The remaining papers are tangential or unrelated to this specific mass threshold. Therefore, the evidence clearly supports the claim.

More for · 1
2022 · cited by 5
This paper notes that massive stars with initial masses greater than or equal to 8 solar masses perish via core-collapse supernovae or failed supernovae.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8404 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt