The logarithmic nature of global warming invalidates climate change claims
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
confidence 18/100
The claim that the logarithmic nature of global warming invalidates climate science is false; climate models explicitly account for the logarithmic relationship between greenhouse gas concentrations and radiative forcing, which still results in significant net warming.
Evidence against · 4
Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcing
2016 · cited by 794
Paper [0] incorporates logarithmic radiative forcing formulations for greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane within standard climate models rather than invalidating them.
See more details
More against · 3
Radiative Forcing and Climate Sensitivity of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Fine-tuned with CERES Data
2023 · cited by 0
Paper [1] uses logarithmic forcing equations for carbon dioxide concentrations to calculate effective radiative forcing and climate sensitivity in alignment with standard frameworks.
Radiative Forcing and Climate Sensitivity
2019 · cited by 0
Paper [2] reviews the theoretical foundations of radiative forcing, including logarithmic relationships, and uses them to calculate surface temperature changes rather than disproving global warming.
Radiative Forcing and Climate Sensitivity
2018 · cited by 0
Paper [3] examines radiative forcing and climate sensitivity under standard physical frameworks, demonstrating that greenhouse gas increases lead to positive net radiative changes.