trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The limit of convergence at higher frequency in an emission spectrum corresponds to the first ionization energy
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against

Peer-reviewed literature demonstrates that evaluating the convergence of Rydberg series in an atomic emission spectrum allows for the determination of the first ionization potential.

Evidence for · 1
Determination of the first ionization energy of polonium by resonance ionization spectroscopy - part I: Measurement of even-parity Rydberg states at TRIUMF-ISAC
2019 · cited by 14
Abstract Rydberg levels in the atomic spectrum of the element polonium (Po, Z = 84) were investigated using two-step laser resonance ionization spectroscopy in order to probe and determine the first ionization potential with high accuracy. As polonium has no stable isotopes, laser resonance ionization spectroscopy was carried out in-source at the Isotope Separator On-Line (ISOL) facility where the radioisotope 206Po was detected after mass separation. Evaluating the convergence of the observed Rydberg series results in a first ionization potential EIP(Po) = 8.418072(3)stat(15)systeV and more than 100 new even-parity Rydberg states belonging to 5 different series. The determined EIP is compared to available literature values and state of the art theoretical atomic many-body calculations.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Determination of the first ionization energy of polonium by resonance ionization spectroscopy - part I: Measurement of even-parity Rydberg states at TRIUMF-ISACpeer-reviewedno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt