trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The Landmark Forum coursework is backed by established psychological science
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
4 sources for · 0 against

Retrieved academic references link the Landmark Forum to philosophical models and note mixed findings or comparative studies regarding large-group awareness trainings, but do not establish comprehensive backing by established psychological science.

Evidence for · 4
2001 · cited by 2
Philosophy promises more than contents of thought. It can cultivate openness to continuously arising new contents of thought. Unconsciously identifying with the contents of thought displaces this openness; the remedy for such unnoticed closed mindedness is self-knowledge. In the Socratic tradition the Landmark Forum - a forty-hour course sponsored by the employee owned Landmark Educational Corporation - provides a model of philosophy as the practical art of uncovering and expanding self-knowledge and thereby generating unforeseen ways of being in everyday life.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:partial_only:for=0+4p:against=0+0p | v55:multi_partial_one_side:lean=lean_partial:for:one_sided

More for · 3
cited by 0
The Promise of Philosophy and the Landmark Forum by Steven R. McCarl, Steve Zaffron, Joyce McCarl Nielsen, Sally Lewis Kennedy :: SSRN [Skip to main content](#maincontent) ** ** [](#) [![PDF icon](https://static.ssrn.com/cfincludes/img/icons/icon-adobe-pdf.svg "PDF icon")Download This Paper](Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID278955_code170891.pdf?abstractid=278955&mirid=1) [Open PDF in Browser](Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID278955_code170891.pdf?abstractid=278955&mirid=1&type=2) [**Add Paper to My Library](#) Share: * [**](#) * [**](#) * [**](#) * [**](#) Permalink Using these links will ensure access to this page indefinitely [Copy URL](#) [Copy DOI](#) # The Promise of Philosophy and the Landmark Forum [Contemporary Philosophy, Vol. XXIII, No. 1 & 2, Jan/Feb & Mar/Apr 2001](#) [Barbados Group Working Paper No. 01-01](#) 10 PagesPosted: 6 Aug 2001Last revised: 8 Jun 2008 [See all articles by Steven R. McCarl**](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=279068)## [Steven R. McCarl](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=279068) University of Denver - Political Science ## [Steve Zaffron](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=279069) Landmark Worldwide LLC
cited by 0
Large-group awareness training Large-group awareness training (LGAT) is a type of personal development training claimed to increase self-awareness and facilitate constructive personal change. LGATs typically involve intensive group sessions, often lasting several consecutive days, with hundreds of participants led by facilitators. LGATs emerged from the encounter group and human potential movements of the 1960s and 1970s and include commercial self-improvement programs such as Erhard Seminars Training(EST), Landmark Forum, and Lifespring. Academic research has reached mixed conclusions regarding their effectiveness and psychological effects: some studies have reported positive outcomes, while others have raised concerns about psychological stress, adverse reactions, and the methods used in some programs. ## Definitions of LGAT In 2005 Rubinstein compared large-group awareness training to certain principles of cognitive therapy, such as the idea that people can change their lives by reinterpreting the way they view external circumstances. In the 1997 collection of essays Consumer Research: Postcards from the edge, discussing behavioral and economic studies, the authors contrast
cited by 0
Characteristics of participants in the Forum, psychotherapy clients, and control participants: A comparative study - Rubinstein - 2005 - Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice - Wiley Online Library Opens in a new windowOpens an external websiteOpens an external website in a new window Close this dialog This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising.To learn more, view the following link:[Privacy Policy](https://www.wiley.com/privacy) Close Cookie Preferences [![British Psychological Society](https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/pb-assets/hub-assets/bpspsychub/logo-header-1601647813137.png)](https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/) [![British Psychological Society](https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/pb-assets/hub-assets/bpspsychub/mobilehublogo-1600764310567.png)](https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/) ** Search withinThis JournalBPS Psych Hub JournalsWiley Online Library * Search term [Advanced Search](https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/search/advanced?publication=20448341)[Citation Search](https://bpspsychub.onlinelib
Everything we examined (4)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. The Promise of Philosophy and the Landmark Forumpeer-reviewedno side taken
  2. The Promise of Philosophy and the Landmark Forumreferenceno side taken
  3. Large-group awareness trainingreferenceno side taken
  4. Characteristics of participants in the Forum, psychotherapy clients, and control participants: A comparative studyreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 001 Aug 2026
held for human review11 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt