trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The Ivory-billed woodpecker is not extinct.
the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - evenly split
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
5 sources for · 5 against

Whether the Ivory-billed Woodpecker is extinct remains a deeply contested subject in ornithology, with some researchers presenting modern audio, video, and habitat sightings to argue for its survival, while others contend the evidence is inconclusive, misidentified, or statistically indicative of extinction.

Evidence for · 5
2020 · cited by 7
Paper 1 applies image processing to recent video footage, revealing features consistent with the Ivory-billed Woodpecker.
Evidence against · 5
2011 · cited by 43
Paper 0 uses a Bayesian model on historical sighting records, concluding there is substantial statistical support for the extinction of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved literature shows a sharp divide between researchers who maintain that recent audio, video, and habitat evidence points to the species' persistence, and critics who argue that the evidence is flawed, often misidentifying pileated woodpeckers, and that standard extinction models apply. Because prominent studies and official bodies like the USFWS have debated or moved to declare extinction while passionate field researchers publish counter-analyses, the balance is definitively contested.

More for · 4
2021 · cited by 6
Paper 2 reports audio recordings of kent calls and double knocks matching the species, supporting its persistence.
2023 · cited by 2
Paper 6 discusses ongoing evidence and recent video analyses arguing for the survival of the Ivory-billed Woodpecker against official extinction declarations.
2024 · cited by 0
Paper 9 examines spectrogram-level audio comparisons showing that suspected ivory-billed woodpecker kent sounds differ significantly from blue jays.
2024 · cited by 0
Paper 11 reviews decades of post-2005 video and field evidence indicating the species persists despite official skepticism.
More against · 4
2024 · cited by 3
Paper 3 argues that claims of rediscovery lack rigorous evidence and run counter to population biology, maintaining the species is extinct.
2023 · cited by 2
Paper 4 details the history of unverified sightings and the official 2021 recommendation by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to declare the bird extinct.
2024 · cited by 2
Paper 5 analyzes the cultural and scientific afterlives of the species, noting that no sighting of the bird has been universally accepted since 1944.
2007 · cited by 0
Paper 10 demonstrates that video evidence from Arkansas used to claim a rediscovery is equally or more compatible with the common Pileated Woodpecker.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → CONTESTED · 2831 Jul 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt